In my
previous post I mentioned that I am reading The Crow’s Dinner by
Jonathan Carroll. As an author he is difficult to describe. At
bookstores I have seen his novels filed with Horror, with Science
Fiction and Fantasy, and with contemporary literature. Magical
realism probably comes closest to defining his genre, but even that
doesn’t quite get it right.
The new
book is different than his others. It is a collection of short, some
very short, essays that he used to publish regularly on Medium.com. I
read them pretty regularly at one point but over time I had gotten
way behind. The book is 500-plus pages of one to two page essays. He
wrote a lot of these. I kind of love them.
Carroll
brings a number of things to all of his writing. He had tremendous
observational skills allowing him to capture the tiny moments of the
every day that brings verisimilitude to the worlds he builds. This
applies not only to the physical world, but also to people, their
behaviors and motivations. It all feels very real, places and people
we all recognize from our own experiences. Then, when something
fantastic or magical occurs, it seems as real as everything else. He
finds the magic in the mundane.
That
seems even more evident in his essays where he deals pretty
exclusively with the real world. He is attentive to it, relating
anecdotes with clarity and vision. He is compassionate about the
human condition in all of its flaws and wonders. With a concise
economy of words he conveys moments of everyday magic.
If you
can’t tell, I am envious of his skill.
This
morning I had a conversation about writing, specifically the merits
of brevity versus longer works. There’s a place for both,
obviously, depending on what your goal is. This conversation was
specifically about writing for comics, and how many words on a page
are too many (because in comics words equal space), and how much the
art should tell. It’s a fine balance and there is no right answer.
That seems to be the one place where my style leans toward the more
sparse and concise. But then Alan Moore of Watchmen fame puts a whole
lot of words on a page and it works.
There’s
a reason that my fiction tends toward novels instead of the short
story. The same is true of my reading habits. To paraphrase, I like
big books, and I can not lie. Big books that comprise trilogies, or
more. But excessive word count isn’t always necessary. A good haiku
says everything it needs to. In the current era when we’re
bombarded by too much information word count can be a detriment. I’m
certainly guilty of scanning web pages instead of reading them
thoroughly. How much time can I spare? While I can’t deny that
Twitter is powerful, I feel that much of it lacks context. Some
topics simply can’t be critically addressed in 140 characters.
But
there has to be a happy medium between a tweet and tl;dr.
I have a
lot to learn from writers like Jonathan Carroll. In this spirit I
plan on trying some new things with this blog. I won’t entirely
give up my longer pieces, but I want to try my hand at shorter posts.
Using his style as a guideline, without completely aping it, I
want to tell smaller stories. A side effect of this, I hope, is that
I will write and post more often, because I often psyche myself out
with the need to write about something more in depth. I want to
observe the world around me a little more closely and report what I
find. I want to look for the magic in the everyday. The post that
immediately precedes this one was an attempt. There will be more.
Last
week I had two experiences that ended with opposite endings to what I
normally expect.
I went
to the Rivers Casino here in Pittsburgh. I’m not a gambler. In the
many years the casino has existed this is my third trip. The first
was when it opened, just to see this new addition to my city. The
next two times for the buffet (which is a different type of gambling,
I suppose). I play low stakes poker with friends occasionally, but
I’m far too intimidated to sit down at a professional table with
strangers. Slot machines are hungry beasts that have never been my
friends. But I was there, for the food, because on my previous trip I
had been given a coupon for a free buffet. Twenty dollars worth of
free is a good thing. I tipped my waitress five bucks and then walked
through the casino to go back to my car. On a whim I stuck a dollar
in a penny slot machine. Fifteen cent bet, no luck. Second fifteen
cent bet... ding ding ding, lights, and sirens! I hit for $6.70.
Pretty good return on a fifteen cent investment. I cashed out because
quit while you’re ahead, right? So I left, full of buffet and,
minus the tip, $1.70 more than I walked in with.
A couple
of days later I made a trip to the library, which I do a lot of. I
read a lot, and the library is free. I still need to occasionally buy
books for my collection, but the library has saved me thousands of
dollars in my lifetime. I had a book on hold, The Crow’s Dinner
by Jonathan Carroll, one of my favorite authors. It’s a large
collection of his short blogs, most of which first appeared on
Medium.com. I followed it for years. While there I stumbled across a
new book about David Bowie called Forever Stardust. Within
five or ten minutes of reading each of them I knew I needed to own
them. They cost more than the dollar seventy from my casino windfall.
As I
mentioned in my previous post I believed that the main reason my
memory of Sequoyah: Young Cherokee Guide was so strong was
because of the art on the back cover. A free hand drawing I did of
that when I was eight is my first very specific memory of realizing I
had some artistic talent, that I could draw. I remembered very little
of the actual story, other than Sequoyah created a phonetic alphabet
that allowed the Cherokee language to be written down for the first
time. I had never really paused to wonder if there was something in
the story itself, rather than just the artwork, that made this stand
out among all the other volumes of Childhoods of Famous Americans
that I read at that time.
After
reading it again for the first time in nearly fifty years, the answer
is yes. Yes there was.
But,
some disclaimers before I go any farther. This entire series of books
were written as story-driven narratives and not as accurate
historical documents. In my subsequent research I discovered that
there are tremendous gaps in what is actually known about Sequoyah. I
will say that the author, Dorothea J. Snow, did an admirable job of
taking what information was available and creating a story that
incorporated actual history. The book is also a product of its time
with some of the attendant problems of racist attitudes and the white
mans interpretation of what Native Americans were. While it firmly
acknowledged the rapaciousness of the European expansion across
America and the mistreatment of the Indians, it also seemed that most
of Sequoyah’s best qualities were inherited from his absent white
father.
But I
read this when I was eight, so none of that was part of my prior
experience, and I have no interest in tearing apart this artifact of
another time in a scathing review. While these are certainly valid
complaints, it’s not what I’m here to talk about.
The book
begins with Sequoyah being teased by his peers because he has to help
his mother with household chores and gardening, something they see as
‟women’s work.” Because he is lame in one leg he is also unable
to hunt or to compete in their sports the way the other boys do. This
also sets him apart.
I was
not lame, and my father was a positive presence in my life, but reading this now, I can see echoes of eight-year-old me. I was, and
let’s be honest here, I still am, a Momma’s boy. Mom has always
been, in many ways, my best friend and I interacted with her in the
house more than a lot of boys do with their mothers. Not so much with the cleaning and
housework, but I liked to help her cook. Dad would want her to chase
me out of the kitchen because he thought I was in her way. I don’t
think it ever crossed his mind back then that we both enjoyed the
experience and that I was earning a valuable life skill (I’m not a
chef by any means, but I can whip up a mean pan gravy). I still do
this when I’m home, and one of my favorite holiday traditions, both
Christmas and Thanksgiving, is helping with the spread. I was much
more interested in learning how to make homemade noodles than in
changing the oil in my car. I resented some of the time Dad would
engage me in car maintenance. I am now incredibly grateful for this
time spent with him that younger me couldn’t appreciate. Interested
in cars or not, the time with Dad was invaluable, and I learned
enough about cars to save me a million times on the road. But, back
then, I would rather have been reading than changing tires.
Okay,
that’s still true.
I was
also not very interested in hunting or sports. These are two of the
most important manhood rituals where I’m from and I just didn’t
care very much for either. Let me say, for all of my friends and
family who do engage, I am not opposed to either of these, then or
now. Just not my thing. When I was twelve I got my hunting license
because I didn’t know how to say no back then. It was just
expected. I loved being out in the woods, but I didn’t feel the
need to kill anything. I did though: squirrels, and groundhogs, and
rabbits in small game season. When I was eighteen I finally
accomplished the ultimate cherry-breaking moment of being a hunter
and shot my first buck. I was literally sick and haven’t been in
the woods with a gun since.
With
sports my lack of interest may be because I’ve simply never been
any good at them. Or, perhaps the reverse is more likely. I never
pushed to be better at sports. Just not competitive enough, I guess.
I went to one practice for wrestling in fifth grade and after
spending an hour on my back with my opponent’s knee in my nuts I
never went back. I played Little League baseball for a year, but that
was more to hang out with a friend than from any real interest in
playing. I could hit pretty well, but couldn’t field for shit. I
was a slow runner.
Which
brings me to an anecdote. The boys in my school loved to race. Every
recess had boys challenging each other to see who was the fastest. I
wasn’t and as a result, got challenged to race a lot. It’s an
easy win, right? One day the playground was covered with snow and
ice. I was wearing boots with really good tread. Due to traction I
won my first race ever, against the guy who always beat me. I won a
second one as well. He didn’t want to race anymore and when I asked
him why he said it was unfair because I knew I was going to beat him.
You know... just like he knew that every other time he challenged me.
Life
lessons.
I hated
the military posturings of my gym teacher and was actually kind of
happy on those occasions when I sprained my ankle or broke my arm and
had an excuse not to participate. I got to go to the library and read
instead.
And of
course, I was teased about all of this. I was teased a lot. Before I
get too far into this I do want to say my childhood wasn’t Hell. I
was picked on, because of my interests and my red hair, and because I
was sensitive and cried easily which made me an easy target. But I
was never beat up. I didn’t live in fear. I had friends. My
teachers mostly liked me (probably not the gym teacher). I recognize
how much of a golden child I was. But I had my tormentors.
And I
see little Wayne in these aspects of Sequoyah.
My
interest in reading and in books is what prompted this blog and
the last one, so it’s no surprise that I share that with Sequoyah
as well. The Cherokee did not have a written language. The white man
came bearing sheets of paper with strange markings on them. These
‟talking leaves” were treaties and orders from the government
that gave them great power. The Cherokee, according to this book,
believed they were magic, allowing the white man to communicate over
long distances. Sequoyah became fascinated by the talking leaves and
became determined to unlock their magic. He spent many years working
on this, becoming an outsider to his people. They thought he was queer (in the old sense of the word), and strange, and maybe dangerous. He would become obsessed with his
project to the detriment of his other work, his friends and family.
As I
pointed out in my last blog, I too became fascinated by the talking
leaves when I was very young and learned their magic very early. In
my world of sports and hunting and those who simply don’t
appreciate books in the same way I do, I too have been considered
strange and queer (in both definitions of that word).
These
things are not mutually exclusive of course. I have friends who hunt
and read. I have friends who are way into sports and read. After
living in Pittsburgh for nearly three decades I have learned an
appreciation for the Steelers I didn’t believe I would ever have.
But I’m
still more interested in books. I still believe that they are magic.
Entire worlds are held between their covers. The wisdom of the ages
is there for anyone to access. They are time machines, allowing us to
hear the thoughts and voices of people long gone. They are portals to
imagination and empathy. The story of Sequoyah that so spoke to me
when I was eight continued to live as strange lines on aging paper
until my now 56-year-old eyes could rediscover it. The words were
unchanged in all those decades, but I am a different person so it is
now a different book.
But, as
this experience teaches me, in many ways I’m still the same book
too.
I have
always loved books. My mother says she read to me constantly as a
baby, long before I was conscious of what books were. As I grew older
she says I was always asking her to read to me. Books, children’s
books, comic strips and comic books... everything that had words on a
page. She smiles as she talks about how she would set the words to
song to put me to sleep at night. She winks when she tells me how I
would correct her if she skipped the words to well-known stories.
For me
books have always been magic. They are portals to other worlds, the
most important of which has been my own imagination.
As you
might guess, I learned to read early. The mystery of what was
contained on these strange marks on paper we call the alphabet was
one I needed to solve. Apparently, for all of her indulgence, I
needed more time with books than Mom could give me. By the time I
started first grade I was already living between the pages. One of my
most-repeated anecdotes of that time was when the teacher, Mrs.
Baldwin, yelled at me for not paying attention. She was teaching the
alphabet to the class and I was bored, so of course I grabbed a book
from the shelf in the back to keep myself occupied while the rest of
the class got caught up. Yeah, I was an arrogant little snot, but I
was bored. I still reach for a book when other people are boring me.
I grew
up in the country so there wasn’t a local library. My small school
was serviced by a library bookmobile and I couldn’t wait for the
weekly visit. Luckily it continued to make rounds during the summer
months as well. The librarian, Mrs. Berryman (who I have alreadywritten about), loved me because of my love of books. By fourth grade
a new grade school had been built, consolidating several smaller
schools and gave Mrs. Berryman a permanent home and large new
library. I practically lived there.
I
graduated to chapter books pretty quickly. The earliest full books I
remember reading were the Howard Pyle version of Robin Hood (I spent
a summer writing a play based on it and trying to recruit my friends
to be in it. It was, sadly, never produced. Luckily, in sixth grade I
was cast as Will Scarlet in a school musical production). I also read
both Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn. In 4th grade my
classmate Charlie Brown (yes, that was actually his name), and I reenacted
the scene from Tom Sawyer where the boys first encounter Injun Joe.
Actual copy from my childhood
My really beat up copy of Tom Sawyer. The copy
of Huck Finn is long gone. Mom says these
were my brother's copies from when he was
little.
There
were a series of books on the library shelves that I plowed through.
They were a series of biographies of figures from American history,
written for children. I specifically remember a few: George
Washington, Abe Lincoln, Kit Carson, Brigham Young, Betsy Ross, and
many others. I read them all, some many times over. I credit these
with my interest in history which eventually led to one of my
undergraduate degrees.
One in
particular stands out in my memory, but not because of history, but
because of art. The book was a biography of the Cherokee Indian
Sequoyah, inventor of a written alphabet for the Cherokee language.
The cover of this book, like all of the covers in this series, was
covered with drawings, done in the inked style of the comic books I
was so familiar with.
In third
grade all of the boys were obsessed with cars, based on the Hot
Wheels and Matchbox toy cars. I had a bunch of these, but I didn’t
have the same obsession. Trapped indoors for recess in the winter
everyone was drawing their favorite cars. I tried, but just couldn’t
get the hang of it. One of my regular tormentors made fun of my
inability to draw. One day, while the others worked at their cars, I
did a freehand drawing based on the art on the book. It was, in my
memory at least, really good. Okay, really good for a third-grader.
My teacher praised it. So did other kids in my class.
My
tormentor said, ‟Yeah, but you still can’t draw cars.”
This
whole experience stands out plainly in my memory. I pinpoint this
drawing of Sequoyah, unfortunately long lost to the ravages of time,
as THE drawing that made me aware that I had some talent. The
one that eventually led to the art I still do today.
The
problem with memory is that it is incomplete. I have spent many years
of my life trying to track down this series of books. Unfortunately,
I had no idea what the titles were, or what the series was called. I
tried my Google-Fu with every variation of ‟American biographies
written for children in the 1960s” you can imagine. Nothing that
ever came up seemed to match. My visual memory for these, especially
for Sequoyah, is strong. I would know it when I saw it. But many
image searches later and I was still unsuccessful. Every trip to a
used bookstore for the last twenty years included a perusal of the
children’s section. Still, no luck.
But
books are magic.
A month
or so ago I was in the main branch of the Carnegie Library. This is
not an unusual occurrence. I typically do two things when I’m
there; I look for very specific books that are next on my reading
list, and I browse the shelves to see what catches my eye. I
frequently discover books and authors I have never heard of before.
That day a book on a display caught my eye due the title.
Morningstar: Growing Up With Books by Ann Hood is not something I
would have ever been aware of except by the synchronicity of it being
there right when I have been researching the concept of Lucifer
Morningstar for another project I’m working on (not a Satanic one,
I swear). It’s also the name of the character I am currently
playing in a superhero roleplaying game. I picked up the book,
discovered it had nothing to do with my research, but saw that it was
a memoir about a woman my age and the significant books she had grown
up with. Good enough for me, so I took it home.
On page
seven of her introduction she mentions a series of of books in her
childhood library called Childhoods of Famous Americans.
Click!
Two
minutes on Google and I had it. Sequoyah: Young Cherokee Guide by
Dorothea J. Snow. I saw the picture of the front cover and I knew my
search had ended.
But it
hadn’t. The thing is, there are multiple printings. I now realize
that I had actually found the book in my searches years ago and
didn’t recognize it because it had a different cover. I looked
around Amazon and Ebay and found copies but none of them showed the
back cover. I finally ordered one with the front cover I recognized.
It arrived a couple of days later and I excitedly tore open the
package only to disscover the back cover was blank. I had the book,
but what I really wanted was the drawing.
So, more
research. I discovered that the cover artist, who also did
illustrations for the interior (all of which lit up memory
switchboards in my brain), was Frank Giacoia, a name I knew from the
hundreds of comic books he pencilled and inked in the 1960s and 70s.
I found another copy for sale with a different cover, but by the same
artist. I ordered it. I was once again disappointed.
Third
time’s the charm. Through Alibris I found a store in Florida that
listed four copies in stock. None of them had pictures. By this time
I had found a photo of the back cover with the drawing I wanted, so I
wrote to the bookseller with the photo. A woman named Virginia wrote
back immediately that she would go their basement and check the
overstock. Four days and eight dollars later and I held the book in
my hands.
I read
it last night. My eyes scanned words I haven’t seen in nearly fifty
years. I stared at the artwork and remembered doing that one specific
drawing, and some of the others I had forgotten about as well. In
reading it now, with a lot more self-awareness, I can see why this
book, more than any of the others in the series stuck with me. The
drawing I did cemented the image in my mind, but the story says a lot
about who I am, and who I was.
I first
heard Nick Cave in the summer of 1988, a little late given his career
up to that point. Like a lot of the music I was discovering at that
time it came from my roommate Steve’s record collection. I had left
my grad school apartment in May but was going back frequently to
visit my friends. While there Steve played Kicking Against the
Pricks, a collection of cover songs. I remember liking the sound
of it, but it was background music to the weekend and didn’t sink
in. I left there with a cassette with Your Funeral, My Trial
on one side and Tender Prey on the other. The Mercy Seat
was the first Nick Cave song I really listened to. By the time Up
Jumped the Devil, the second track on the album, was over I was a
confirmed fan. Since that time Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds have
remained in the uppermost echelon of musicians I’m into.
I saw
him on Thursday night at the Carnegie Music Hall in Pittsburgh. While
I admit that I’m riding high on the adrenaline I want to say that
this was simply one of the single best concert experiences I have
ever had... and I’ve been to a lot of shows. This is not the first
time I’ve seen Nick, but the fifth, including his only other
appearance in the Pittsburgh area with Lollapalooza in 1993. I want
to talk a little bit about the specifics of this show, and then tie
it in with a broader context of Nick and his work.
First
just let me get my complete fanboy moment out of the way. I had paid
what for me is a pretty high price for this ticket. I was down close to the stage, but off to one side. It would have been a great
seat, except that speaker stacks blocked my view of about 80% of the
stage.
I was
feeling pretty pissy about the whole thing when the concert began.
Nick came out and sat in a chair at the front of the stage and
performed Anthrocene. His presence was great, but I really wanted to
be able to see the Bad Seeds as well. At the beginning of the second
song he stalked along the front of the stage, motioning for everyone
to move closer. My seat was kind of crap, so along with a lot of
other people I moved.
Much better.
There
were crates of some sort along the floor in front of the stage,
allowing Nick to come even closer by standing on them. During the
second song he moved to a crate right in front of me and began
singing to our segment of the crowd. Next thing I knew he had leaned
onto my shoulder and stretched himself out over the crowd. I stood
there, one hand on his chest directly over his heart, and the other
bracing his side, supporting his weight while he sang. So, while I
still can’t say I’ve met Nick Cave, I can say I’ve held him.
I was
not alone. Nick spent a lot of time in the crowd. I mean really in
the crowd. He walked into the seats, and over them, held in place
with the hands of many of us who were down front. It was the most
intimate show of his I’ve ever seen.
Nick is not a stranger to mingling with the audience. Early videos of him with his band The Birthday Party, show him completely engulfed by the small crowds, with seemingly no concern for his personal bodily boundaries or safety. This was very much in the spirit of Punk Rock confrontational theatrics. His performance style for much of his career has had the element of the confrontational to it. If not directly in people’s faces like in the early days, then certainly in terms of subject matter and intensity of performance.
This fit
his image as a fire and brimstone preacher of Apocalyptic visions.
His image, and this was a big part of what appealed to me way back
when, was that of a larger than life, mythic wandering doomsayer. He
was the offspring of a world created by Johnny Cash, William Faulkner, and Manly Wade Wellman. The world he created through his
lyrics and music (and his poetry and novels), was one where God and
the devil were engaged in daily warfare, one populated by angels and
demons, both made manifest in the actions of people and their own
virtues and vices. It was dark and thunderous and dangerous, yet
redemption and salvation were both possible down in the mud of our
dark desires. His concerts often had the ambiance of a tent revival
or a faith healing. For his fans they were both.
The new
show still is, but there is a difference. His interactions with the
crowd were more of an embrace than an attack. He was calling people
in instead of pushing them away. His approach was more confessional
than confrontational. This change is not completely new. In a spoken
word piece entitled The Flesh Made Word he described his own
journey using the Bible as a metaphor. The early Nick was the Old
Testament, frightening and judgmental wrath of God Nick, while he
saw himself moving into the New Testament love and compassion of
Christ Nick. Both sides are still definitely present, but the tent
revival I saw this week was far more about building a community of
love and support than it was about fear.
There
are reasons for this. Nick has been wandering in a wilderness of loss
and grief recently. In 2015 his fifteen year old son Arthur fell from
a cliff and died. The documentary, One More Time With
Feeling, deals overtly and honestly with the aftermath of this.
Nick went back to work in the studio, and Skeleton Tree, the new album, is now marinated
with loss and sadness. We see Nick, his wife Susie, and Arthur’s
twin brother Earl throughout, trying to move on with life in the
midst of grief. I have seen and read a lot of interviews with Nick
throughout the years. He has always been someone who was powerful and
larger than life. He was self assured, and fiercely intelligent, and
a master wordsmith. In the film he appears lost and broken, a man of
words who simply can’t find any to express his new world. We see
the process of recording, where Nick seems more vulnerable than ever
before. His voice breaks with emotion many times, but these takes
were kept for the final release. While it is a difficult film to
watch it is ultimately uplifting. Nick and his family make a
conscious decision to live their life, honoring Arthur and not
forgetting him.
‟Everything
is not OK, but that's OK, right? If things go on, you know, if anyone
is interested, the records go on and we still do what we do, um, and
the work goes on. And in that respect, things continue. A belief in
the good in things, in the world, in ourselves evaporated. But you
know, after a while, after a time, Susie and I decided to be happy.
As happiness seemed to be an act of revenge. An act of defiance. To
care about each other. And everyone else. And be careful. To be
careful with each other and the ones around us.”
The
concert was this idea made flesh. He seemed happy on stage. He
interacted with the crowd more than I have ever seen him do before.
He bantered with people, touched them. He didn’t just come out into
the crowd, he invited people into his space, allowing himself to be
held by the audience, to be buoyed up by them and their love, and in
return, gathered in the community he had created, he shouted his
defiance to the heavens.
The show
itself was a mix of the new and the old, with a noticeable gap of
anything from the mid 90s until the last two albums. As a long time
fan, if Nick had asked me personally which of the old songs I wanted
to hear, he pretty much did everything that would have been on my
list. He has always been able to transition seamlessly between the
furious and the funereal and this was no exception. After four of his
newer, more atmospheric, but no less powerful, songs he said ‟I
wanna tell you about a girl,” and launched into From Her to
Eternity, and this driving song about obsession and stalking and
murder brought down the house. This was followed immediately by the
sound of distant thunder from the stage and I knew that we were in
Tupelo.
The
decision to perform this song was one of the most surprising for me.
It’s one of his classics and a regular feature of his concerts. But
the recent details of his life has given it new context. While a lot
of Skeleton Tree was written before Arthur’s death many of
the lyrics seem prescient given what happened. It is impossible to
listen to the album without this event infusing your interpretation
of it. What is more fascinating to me is how this can now color our
perceptions of his previous work as well. The lyrics of Tupelo play
with the idea of how we mythologize real people, particularly modern
rock stars. The song conflates Elvis with Christ, the King who will
rise again. For years some people did not believe that Elvis was
dead, and he was treated with a religious fervor. Elvis was a twin.
His minutes-older sibling died in childbirth. The imagery of the dead
twin runs throughout the song, now conveying the extra resonance of
Cave’s own twin sons, one of whom is gone. In the raging elemental
fury of the performance I found myself emotionally gut-punched by the
new meanings of these lyrics, of which Nick has to be very aware.
‟Well
Saturday gives what Sunday steals,
And a
child is born on his brothers heels,
Come
Sunday morn the first-born dead,
In a
shoebox tied with a ribbon of red.”
The
final repeated refrain, changed slightly from the recorded version,
of, ‟Oh mama rock your lil’ one slow, Oh mama hold your baby,”
was being sung with full, lived knowledge of how easy it is to lose
that child.
He
followed Tupelo with Jubilee Street, from the 2013 album Push the
Sky Away. This song in particular felt like Nick
shouting his defiance. Interspersed with the repeated refrain, ‟Look
at me now,” he seemed to be addressing Death directly, speaking of
his transformation, the alchemy of his loss producing gold.
‟I am
alone now.
I am
beyond recriminations.
The
curtains are shut.
The
furniture has gone.
I am
transforming.
I am
vibrating.
I am
glowing.
I am
flying.
Look at
me now!”
The
Weeping Song is a favorite of mine from his album The Good
Son. It has always spoken to the idea of true sadness and grief
in this world. Twenty-five years ago Nick knew that, ‟True weeping
is yet to come.”
Former Bad Seed Blixa Bargeld is the other man in this video.
He has not been with the band for many years.
Into
My Arms is perhaps my favorite
love song. It is a paean of romance sung by a skeptic, acknowledging
the one thing he can truly believe in. It echoes a lot of what lives
in my head and heart and has long held a special place for me and one
other. You know who you are.
I can’t
stress enough that although there was a lot of sad, grief-filled
content to this show, it was not a dirge. It was a celebration, not
just of Arthur, but of life, and love, and perhaps above all else,
the idea of community and all of us taking care of each other and
supporting our friends. I said earlier that it seemed that Nick was
inviting us into his space, breaking the barrier of the stage and
audience dichotomy by joining us on the floor. This was taken to it’s
logical conclusion during the final number, Push the Sky Away.
Once again Nick began to gesture for the crowd to come closer, even
though we were already as close to the stage as we could be. When he
took a woman’s hand and helped her onto the stage, then kept
gesturing, his intentions became clear. He was inviting us to join
him, physically onstage. About a hundred of us did so. I stood in
this crowd with Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds, an impromptu chorus,
singing along with him as he closed the show with what became a hymn
for everyone there.
‟And
some people say it’s just rock and roll,
Oh but
it gets you right down to your soul.
You’ve
gotta just keep on pushing and keep on pushing and
This
past Friday I was pleasantly reminded of a lot of my listening habits
of the 90s. It can be difficult to remember where your head was at
any given moment in your life, or why the music that spoke to you did
so. I came into the 90s riding a wave of alternative music, listening
to The Pixies, and The Replacements, and Nick Cave, and bunch of
other stuff I had discovered in the late 80s. For the most part I
ignored the Grunge movement. I could hear their influences in the
stuff I had already been listening to and while I didn’t exactly
hate Grunge none it spoke to me very much either. I liked Nirvana,
but didn’t own their albums until many years later, partly due to
everyone I knew already having a copy. I didn’t have to work very
hard to be able to hear it.
I did
discover a lot of music though. I went through a brief Alt-Country
phase, though my tastes there tended toward the weird extremes of the
genre. Most of these have long fallen by the wayside for me since
then. I continued to follow the careers of many of the 80s artists I
was into. Lloyd Cole and the Jazz Butcher continued to release new
material though it seemed less and less people cared (not that many
did in the first place, I guess). I tried out a lot of bands that I
first saw on MTV’s 120 Minutes. I went to a few big festivals and
saw a lot of bands I would never have gone to see if they played
solo.
One of
these festivals I went to, twice, was Lilith Fair. There seemed to be
an explosion of new female vocalists/singer-songwriters at the time
and I was drawn to a lot of them. I saw Dar Williams live several
times. I picked up albums by Tori Amos and Bjork. I did a phone
interview with Jewel when she was eighteen years old, about six
months before she broke huge. Listening to women rock stars was
nothing completely new for me. I owned a lot of Fleetwood Mac, and
Blondie, and The Runaways, and The Eurythmics, and Missing Persons,
among others. But in the 90s, like what I said about Alt-Country, my
tastes in women vocalists tended toward the weird end of things.
One of
them was Christina Martinez and her band, Boss Hog. Christina is
married to Jon Spencer of the Jon Spencer Blues Explosion. Jon plays
guitar and shares vocals with Christina in Boss Hog, but it is
definitely her band. I wrote about them twice for local newsweeklies
in the 90s and saw them once at the now-defunct Grafitti (Cibo Mato was the opening act). They only released two very short full albums and a handful
of EPs, so their output was pretty small. Whatever, I listened to
them a lot.
This features Jon Spencer more than most of their songs.
After
almost two decades of nothing, this spring Boss Hog released a new
album and went on tour. I went to see them at Cattivo, a small local
venue here in Pittsburgh last Friday. The lineup includes both
Martinez and Spencer, as well as Hollis Queens and Jens Jurgenson,
their original drummer and bassist. Mickey Finn, who was not with
them originally, rounded out the band on keyboards. It was a much
more intimate show than when I saw them before. Spencer himself was
working the merchandise table and was very accessible. The other band
members hung out in the crowd watching the opening acts (including my
friends in The Homisides from down Charleroi way).
Their
performance was remarkable. First of all, it was obvious that they
were really having fun up there. The love and enthusiasm for what
they were doing brought everyone into the show. Christina left the
stage to sing from the midst of the crowd. At one point she leaned on
my shoulder and sang directly into my face, about six inches away.
Queens and Jurgenson were tight and powerful, a thundering rhythm
section. I don’t play drums, and as much as I listen to music I
admit it is the piece of bands I notice least, at least overtly.
Drums underlie all of the parts I’m paying more attention to. I
recognize this as a lack on my part, but other than a great drum solo
I find myself not paying much attention to drummers. Hollis Queens
was the exception. She was simply fierce on drums and it was
difficult to take my eyes off of her. She also adds vocals to one of my favorite Boss Hog songs, Whiteout. The show ended with the song Texas, possibly my favorite Boss Hog track.
A little naughty...
Boss Hog
never really completely fell out of my listening rotation,
like a lot of artists have. But, since Friday I’ve listened to all
of their albums (the new one is great!) and EPs, and watched a lot of
YouTube videos, reclaiming my fandom. This has reminded me of a few
other women vocalists/performers I was into at the same time, all but
one of which are relatively unknown. While I can’t describe exactly
what it is, I can hear some kind of similarity among them, a reason I
got into all of them. In every case their vocals feel earthier to me,
more grounded. Many of the women singers of that era tended toward
the more ethereal in their vocalizations. It’s not that I don’t
like that, but it seems I’m drawn to something more visceral. In
every case the music veers away from mostly traditional rock songs or
ballads as well, though there are exceptions. Slower, but driving, if
that’s a thing. Spaces in the music for the ear to rest, but
underpinned with heavy bass and drums. More than a little distortion.
There is a sparseness, but lots of emotion.
In my
novel This Creature Fair I write about a rock star named
Morrigan Blue. She and the band I create for her are the archetype
for this type of sound. I can hear it in my head even if I can never completely describe it.
I’m
not summing it up very well. Let me give you my examples.
I saw
the video for Dragon Lady by the Geraldine Fibbers on 120 Minutes and
was immediately a fan. I bought the album without having heard
another song and it was a desert island album for me for years (it
might still be). They fell into the weirder end of the Alt-Country
thing I mentioned. In the first article I wrote about them for In
Pittsburgh Newsweekly I described them as the offspring of
Hank Williams and Sonic Youth. I still think that’s a pretty good
descriptor. Carla Bozelich has a deep, raspy voice that just oozes
emotion for me. I did a phone interview with her that formed the
basis of a major article I had published in No Depression Magazine,
the national music mag for Alt-Country (there was some editing of
what I wrote that Carla wasn’t happy about, but we talked it
through). I saw them once in Pittsburgh and twice in Washington DC.
By that time guitarist Nels Cline, who is currently in Wilco, had
joined the band.
As much as I love this I understand how they're an acquired taste. My friend Lee nearly jumped out of our car into the desert at 90 miles an hour when I put this on.
Before
the Geraldine Fibbers, Carla had been with Ethyl Meatplow, who you
might know about from the song Devil’s Johnson which was featured
in an episode of Beavis and Butthead. Since then she has been
involved in a number of projects, both solo and as part of other
bands, including a song-for-song cover of Willie Nelson’s Redheaded
Stranger album, which Willie gave his blessing to by joining her on a
couple of tracks. While I still love her voice she has moved into
realms of experimental music that has left me behind.
At that
same time I discovered Congo Norvell. Kid Congo Powers is a guitarist
who has one of the best alternative resumes in music, having played
with the Gun Club, the Cramps, and Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds. Kid
is a very idiosyncratic guitarist who, by his own admission, never
really learned to play guitar the ‟right” way. He uses lots of
alternative tunings and is much more interested in finding
interesting sounds to make with his guitar than in traditional
playing. To my ears his instincts are good. Vocalist Sally Norvell
has a voice that simply makes me melt. I called it a ‟mix of honey
and sand” when I wrote about them.
I had
been given the go-ahead to write an article or do an interview by my
editor at Kulture Deluxe magazine, a short-lived and long defunct
national music mag I wrote for a long time ago. I had tracked down
their agent to ask for an interview, but in the meantime I went to
see them in DC and was lucky enough to meet them after the show. When
I inquired about setting something up Sally wrote her home number on a
napkin and told me to call anytime. I did and they were fantastic.
They sent me an advance copy of their new album, The Dope, The
Lies, The Vaseline, which was never officially released. I’m
among a very small population of people who own a copy of this. This
ended up being the biggest feature article I ever had published.
I can’t
really say that Sally and I are friends in any way other than the
Facebook kind, but we stayed in touch over the years. When she
released her solo album Choking Victim I was probably one of
the few music journalists lining up to review it.
The last
of these 90s female performers I want to talk about is the most
well-known. PJ Harvey is well into her third decade as a respected
musician. 120 Minutes was my first introduction to her through the video for Dry. I heard her first three albums
through a friend of mine who was much more into her at the time than
I was. But then she released To Bring You My Love and I fell
in love. This still ranks as one of my all time favorite albums, just
hitting me in the sweet spot of right time, right place in my life.
After that I become a completist for her music, tracking down obscure
b-sides and unreleased tracks and bootleg live shows... there are a
lot of them. Part of what I have loved about PJ is that she has
continued to grow and change as an artist, every album moving in a
new direction. I fully admit that I have not been as into her recent
work as I once was. I think she’s still doing important work and
following her specific muse, but it doesn’t speak to me in the same
way. Still, she is an artist that I will always be interested to see
where she goes next.
Unlike
the others, I’ve never met PJ, though I have seen her live many
times. Two of those shows stand out. In December of 2000 she was
breaking in a new band in anticipation of being the opening act for
U2. She played a small number of unannounced secret shows that I was
lucky enough to hear about and get tickets to. I saw her at the Black
Cat in DC, the same venue where I had seen the Geraldine Fibbers and
Congo Norvell. The Black Cat is essentially a small bar and I stood
about three feet from her during the performance. Even then she was a
big enough star that this kind of intimate show was a once in a
lifetime opportunity. The next fall, after the U2 tour, I saw
her headlining again with the same band at the 9:30 Club. This show
stands out because of the date. It was 9/10/2001. The next morning,
while I was driving out of DC, the World Trade Centers fell and the
Pentagon was hit by a plane.
Unfortunately
I didn't see the To Bring You My Love tour in 1995.
This is
what passed for PJ's Glam period.
-->
I can
hear the similarities in these performers, at least in my world of
aural pleasure. I can understand why they all appealed to me in some
of the same ways. I’m sure there are others who fall in this
category but I haven’t discovered a lot of them that speak to me in
the same way. I’m sure some of that is simply where I am in life as
well. Not too many years ago I got into The Kills, fully aware that
they were hitting me in the same place as the bands I’ve just
talked about. There is an overall sound to the band I like and
vocalist Alison Mossheart fits squarely in the realm I’ve been
discussing. I really like the work she has done with Jack White in
The Dead Weather as well.
-->
I’m
not sure of the purpose of this, other than finally gathering all of
these together in one place. Hopefully some of you will explore these
artists and discover something you love. In the meantime, I’m
enjoying a nostalgic indulgence.