As I
mentioned in my previous post I believed that the main reason my
memory of Sequoyah: Young Cherokee Guide was so strong was
because of the art on the back cover. A free hand drawing I did of
that when I was eight is my first very specific memory of realizing I
had some artistic talent, that I could draw. I remembered very little
of the actual story, other than Sequoyah created a phonetic alphabet
that allowed the Cherokee language to be written down for the first
time. I had never really paused to wonder if there was something in
the story itself, rather than just the artwork, that made this stand
out among all the other volumes of Childhoods of Famous Americans
that I read at that time.
After
reading it again for the first time in nearly fifty years, the answer
is yes. Yes there was.
But,
some disclaimers before I go any farther. This entire series of books
were written as story-driven narratives and not as accurate
historical documents. In my subsequent research I discovered that
there are tremendous gaps in what is actually known about Sequoyah. I
will say that the author, Dorothea J. Snow, did an admirable job of
taking what information was available and creating a story that
incorporated actual history. The book is also a product of its time
with some of the attendant problems of racist attitudes and the white
mans interpretation of what Native Americans were. While it firmly
acknowledged the rapaciousness of the European expansion across
America and the mistreatment of the Indians, it also seemed that most
of Sequoyah’s best qualities were inherited from his absent white
father.
But I
read this when I was eight, so none of that was part of my prior
experience, and I have no interest in tearing apart this artifact of
another time in a scathing review. While these are certainly valid
complaints, it’s not what I’m here to talk about.
The book
begins with Sequoyah being teased by his peers because he has to help
his mother with household chores and gardening, something they see as
‟women’s work.” Because he is lame in one leg he is also unable
to hunt or to compete in their sports the way the other boys do. This
also sets him apart.
I was
not lame, and my father was a positive presence in my life, but reading this now, I can see echoes of eight-year-old me. I was, and
let’s be honest here, I still am, a Momma’s boy. Mom has always
been, in many ways, my best friend and I interacted with her in the
house more than a lot of boys do with their mothers. Not so much with the cleaning and
housework, but I liked to help her cook. Dad would want her to chase
me out of the kitchen because he thought I was in her way. I don’t
think it ever crossed his mind back then that we both enjoyed the
experience and that I was earning a valuable life skill (I’m not a
chef by any means, but I can whip up a mean pan gravy). I still do
this when I’m home, and one of my favorite holiday traditions, both
Christmas and Thanksgiving, is helping with the spread. I was much
more interested in learning how to make homemade noodles than in
changing the oil in my car. I resented some of the time Dad would
engage me in car maintenance. I am now incredibly grateful for this
time spent with him that younger me couldn’t appreciate. Interested
in cars or not, the time with Dad was invaluable, and I learned
enough about cars to save me a million times on the road. But, back
then, I would rather have been reading than changing tires.
Okay,
that’s still true.
I was
also not very interested in hunting or sports. These are two of the
most important manhood rituals where I’m from and I just didn’t
care very much for either. Let me say, for all of my friends and
family who do engage, I am not opposed to either of these, then or
now. Just not my thing. When I was twelve I got my hunting license
because I didn’t know how to say no back then. It was just
expected. I loved being out in the woods, but I didn’t feel the
need to kill anything. I did though: squirrels, and groundhogs, and
rabbits in small game season. When I was eighteen I finally
accomplished the ultimate cherry-breaking moment of being a hunter
and shot my first buck. I was literally sick and haven’t been in
the woods with a gun since.
With
sports my lack of interest may be because I’ve simply never been
any good at them. Or, perhaps the reverse is more likely. I never
pushed to be better at sports. Just not competitive enough, I guess.
I went to one practice for wrestling in fifth grade and after
spending an hour on my back with my opponent’s knee in my nuts I
never went back. I played Little League baseball for a year, but that
was more to hang out with a friend than from any real interest in
playing. I could hit pretty well, but couldn’t field for shit. I
was a slow runner.
Which
brings me to an anecdote. The boys in my school loved to race. Every
recess had boys challenging each other to see who was the fastest. I
wasn’t and as a result, got challenged to race a lot. It’s an
easy win, right? One day the playground was covered with snow and
ice. I was wearing boots with really good tread. Due to traction I
won my first race ever, against the guy who always beat me. I won a
second one as well. He didn’t want to race anymore and when I asked
him why he said it was unfair because I knew I was going to beat him.
You know... just like he knew that every other time he challenged me.
Life
lessons.
I hated
the military posturings of my gym teacher and was actually kind of
happy on those occasions when I sprained my ankle or broke my arm and
had an excuse not to participate. I got to go to the library and read
instead.
And of
course, I was teased about all of this. I was teased a lot. Before I
get too far into this I do want to say my childhood wasn’t Hell. I
was picked on, because of my interests and my red hair, and because I
was sensitive and cried easily which made me an easy target. But I
was never beat up. I didn’t live in fear. I had friends. My
teachers mostly liked me (probably not the gym teacher). I recognize
how much of a golden child I was. But I had my tormentors.
And I
see little Wayne in these aspects of Sequoyah.
My
interest in reading and in books is what prompted this blog and
the last one, so it’s no surprise that I share that with Sequoyah
as well. The Cherokee did not have a written language. The white man
came bearing sheets of paper with strange markings on them. These
‟talking leaves” were treaties and orders from the government
that gave them great power. The Cherokee, according to this book,
believed they were magic, allowing the white man to communicate over
long distances. Sequoyah became fascinated by the talking leaves and
became determined to unlock their magic. He spent many years working
on this, becoming an outsider to his people. They thought he was queer (in the old sense of the word), and strange, and maybe dangerous. He would become obsessed with his
project to the detriment of his other work, his friends and family.
As I
pointed out in my last blog, I too became fascinated by the talking
leaves when I was very young and learned their magic very early. In
my world of sports and hunting and those who simply don’t
appreciate books in the same way I do, I too have been considered
strange and queer (in both definitions of that word).
These
things are not mutually exclusive of course. I have friends who hunt
and read. I have friends who are way into sports and read. After
living in Pittsburgh for nearly three decades I have learned an
appreciation for the Steelers I didn’t believe I would ever have.
But I’m
still more interested in books. I still believe that they are magic.
Entire worlds are held between their covers. The wisdom of the ages
is there for anyone to access. They are time machines, allowing us to
hear the thoughts and voices of people long gone. They are portals to
imagination and empathy. The story of Sequoyah that so spoke to me
when I was eight continued to live as strange lines on aging paper
until my now 56-year-old eyes could rediscover it. The words were
unchanged in all those decades, but I am a different person so it is
now a different book.
But, as
this experience teaches me, in many ways I’m still the same book
too.